The KitchenAid Stand Mixer: a primer

This is the first in an occasional series about the history and lore of kitchen gadgets and machines. 

Back in my single days, I used to (sort of) joke that the only way I’d ever be able to afford a KitchenAid stand mixer would be to get married. Turns out I did something far riskier than getting married to acquire my cobalt blue K5 Heavy Duty model—I opened  a restaurant, which is another story, or about a thousand of them, for other days and other posts. Said mixer is now sixteen years old. Though it has essentially been on light duty since the restaurant years, it still sees a reasonable amount of use, and despite it all, it’s still a maintenance-free workhorse in our kitchen. It lives in a cabinet above the fridge, and gets hoisted down for crepes, pancakes, icing, bread and loads of other chores which I suppose we could do with some other tool, but it sure does every one of them one hell of a lot better than anything else could.

This now-iconic kitchen stalwart can thank a sweaty baker in a hot kitchen for its existence. Herbert Johnson, an engineer at Hobart, who still makes those enormous floor models you see in bakeries and school cafeterias, correctly decided that some innovation was needed after watching a baker sweat into his dough while kneading by hand. I’m guessing this isn’t a particularly unusual event, even now, but I’m on board with minimizing the level of human-sourced salt in food for sure.

The first few years of production were during WWI, when metal shortages prevented the majority of non-military industrial output. Thankfully, the Navy was sufficiently impressed by Hobart’s huge, 80-quart mixers to make them standard equipment on all of their battleships, thus assuring their production through the war. When business returned to normal after the war, Hobart got busy on a home model. Early versions were bulky and expensive, but were already impressing home cooks lucky enough to test them. Legend has it that one of the early product testers, the wife of a factory executive, is responsible for the name; she was so blown away by its performance that she exclaimed, “I don’t care what you call it, but I know it’s the best kitchen aid I’ve ever had!”

The Model "H" was the first KitchenAid stand mixer. Image Credit: Touring-Ohio.com

Owning a Kitchenaid stand mixer in those days took both healthy biceps and a nicely-padded wallet. They weighed 65 pounds and cost a fortune—$2557.75 in current US dollars—and yet were somehow peddled door-to-door by an all-female sales staff, who were evidently badass enough with their demonstration skills to keep these hulks in production. I searched in vain for images of women in heels and skirts hauling 65 pound mixers door to door, but alas, you’ll have to rely on your imagination. Further refinements led to a machine that, by the mid 1920’s, was much smaller and lighter, and much easier on the wallet, coming in at about $400 in today’s dollars.

The real game-changer was Egmont Arens’s complete re-design in the mid 30’s. His award-winning design is both elegant and exceptionally evocative of the time. As you’d guess, it’s a hit with collectors.

KitchenAid stand mixer, 1936

Arens was not only an exceptionally talented industrial designer, he once owned the famous Washington Square Bookshop in Greenwich Village, where he published nine issues of Playboy: A Portfolio of Art and Satire. It’s not the Playboy you’re imagining:

Limited to only nine issues over the course of about four years, Playboy was a socially progressive and nearly radical publication in its day, known for including jabbing parody of the rich during the “roaring” 1920s. Associated with the magazine were artists of stature in their day and of renown today, including Georgia O’keefe [sic], photographer Alfred Stieglitz, John Marin, Rockwell Kent, Hunt Diedrich and William Gropper. Among this group more than one was identified with sensitive political and social views of the day, and even homosexuality. (source)

He went on to be the art editor at Vanity Fair and the editor of Creative Arts. He also operated Flying Stag Press from 1918 until 1927, and published a guidebook, The Little Book of Greenwich Village, which, from what I can gather, was based on the proliferation of “little magazines” of Greenwich Village, the ‘zines of their time. These publications featured the first published works of many in the modernist literary movement, including James Joyce and Marianne Moore. Here’s a quote that sums up the little magazine scene well:

A bemused reporter visiting the Village from Oregon in 1922 described the Village’s little magazines to his hometown audience as follows: “Every villager will tell you that the soul of this unique colony is best expressed by the bizarre, tantalizing freaks in paper and printer’s ink in which free verse, cubistic paintings and ultra-violet sex fiction gives expression to what the villagers like to believe is their tortured, psychic and mystical selves.” (source)

I don’t know about you, but a tie-in between bohemianism, modernism, literature, art, design and cooking is right in my wheelhouse. And until just now, I’ll bet you couldn’t have drawn a straight line between James Joyce and a stand mixer.

Arens’s other designs include watches, gorgeous lacquered chairs, aircraft, lawn furniture, lamps, and particularly gorgeous Hobart meat slicer:

Egmont Arens meat slicer

Arens was also an early advocate of “planned obsolescence”, a concept now so completely familiar and so widely adopted by manufacturers of consumer goods that it’s difficult to imagine its absence. Ironically, his best-known contribution to design is also the most durable. His familiar bullet-shaped KitchenAid stand mixer design was introduced in 1937, and has endured to this day.

Devotion to this machine takes some strange and wonderful forms. A list, for your entertainment and enrichment:

  • An argument about Hobart-era vs. Whirlpool era KitchenAid mixers can be found here
  • A favorite blogger in her kitchen in Seattle – notice the Hobart-era KitchenAid on the lover shelf. (Also notice her gorgeous kitchen.)
  • Want one tattooed to your flesh? Of course you do.

An upper arm with a KitchenAid stand mixer tattoo

Stickers decorating a KitchenAid stand mixer

One of my favorite food bloggers, David Lebovitz, lucked into a VIP visit to the KitchenAid factory in Ohio, where every single KitchenAid stand mixer is still made. You’ll have to do a little clicking to see his photos—he’s not ok with photo sharing—so off you go. I’ll wait.

(Drumming fingers…) Cool. So now you know that these sexy mixers have earned their reputation for durability—that they’re tested to replicate 30 years of household use, that they’re oiled with three times the necessary lubricant, and that their product support is second to none. Though I still find it difficult to believe that Europeans pay a couple of hundred dollars more for theirs than we do, I’m 100% ok with paying good money for a product that the manufacturer expects to last for 30 years.

And you know, I’m happy to learn that Julia and I chose the same machine in the same color.

Julia Child's KitchenAid stand mixer


  1. Leolady’s KitchenAid Mixer History – Everything you could possibly want to know about KitchenAid mixers. My favorite tidbit? This (admittedly not as cool as the original) copper bowl for the K5. You’re welcome.
  2. All Things Considered, September 7, 2009
  3. The KitchenAid stand mixer Wikipedia page
  4. David Lebovitz, of course
  5. More on Egmont Arens here, here, and, of course, here
  6. Egmont Arens, Industrial Humaneer, December 1946
  7. More on Playboy: a portfolio of art and satire here and here, and more on the little magazines of Greenwich Village here
  8. A nice summation of KitchenAid’s history here, with cool photos
  9. Featured image credit: Wikipedia
  10. Photo of The Model “H”, the first  KitchenAid stand mixer. Image Credit: Touring-Ohio.com

Tags: , ,

10 Responses to “The KitchenAid Stand Mixer: a primer”

  1. Tsoniki Crazy Bull August 8, 2013 at 12:14 pm #

    I LOVE my KitchenAid and am sad to leave it when we go to France. But I admit to also not using it very often! I do use my KitchenAid blender almost daily. I thought I would use the stand mixer just as often, but I just don’t. I loved the factory tour you linked to, and how cool that women used to sell them door to door!

    • kim place-gateau August 8, 2013 at 12:19 pm #

      Yeah, that was some rough work, I’m guessing. I wish I could have found an image to post, but I’ll keep an eye out for sure!

      BTW, we ran KA successfully on a transformer for 3+ years in Germany, if that helps.

  2. irishjenn August 8, 2013 at 8:35 pm #

    Gah! Only ONE photo of Molly Wizenberg’s kitchen?
    Thanks for the history of the KA mixer. I love mine, even though I don’t use it to its full potential I will someday, though.

    • kim place-gateau August 8, 2013 at 9:11 pm #

      No problem – glad you liked it 🙂
      If you’re interested in learning more, Leolady’s blog is pretty incredible. There’s a book in that blog somewhere.

  3. TammyJ August 8, 2013 at 10:30 pm #

    I’m really not much a cook nor baker, yet I love my KitchenAid. It makes me feel like the real-deal. I enjoyed learning more about the history. I’ve been trying to figure out the age of my KA. I inherited it from a roommate about 20 years ago. She had inherited from her mother. I do not know how long the mother had it but based on the color (kind of a yellowy-avocado green) and the wiring, I’m guessing it’s from the 70’s. Works great!
    Also, major kudos to the women selling them door to door. I get enough of a work out just taking mine up out of the cabinet!

    • kim place-gateau August 8, 2013 at 10:38 pm #

      Lucky you! If you’re right, and it’s from the 70’s, you’ve got yourself a Hobart model. Check your serial number online to be sure. Though I’ve been very happy with mine, lots of people think the old Hobarts are the better machines. Keep that one around!

      • TammyJ August 8, 2013 at 11:24 pm #

        Wow! I am now spending way too much time researching my mixer. It is a Hobart, Model K45. From what I can gather, this model was manufactured between 1962 and 1978, I have yet to find a serial number on it anywhere. Also, feeling like I should probably take better care of it!

        • kim place-gateau August 9, 2013 at 12:01 pm #

          Yup! It’s a classic. Time to learn to use it! 🙂

  4. julia August 10, 2013 at 5:02 am #

    I have a friend who made the best chocolate chip cookies — after asking for several years, he finally gave me the recipe — although he said, no one is able to replicate them! I went home, made them, and, as he predicted, they didn’t taste the same. I, of course, accused him of leaving out an ingredient or changing it when he gave me the recipe. So I went to his house and watched him bake them — the only difference between what he had done and what I had one was that he used a KitchenAid and I used my cheapo mixer. So, after getting a KitchenAid, now I can finally make the cookies and they taste like his. What does the KitchenAid do that makes the cookies taste different? I have no idea, but it does 🙂

    • kim place-gateau August 10, 2013 at 12:25 pm #

      Must be that patented planetary action!